7 responses
-
J.R. Goleno said (4 Aug 2007):
well, it's true that this picture is not straight from camera, but I don't believe I've done anything outside of what a Darkroom can do. The only changes have been color temperature, grain, and contrast. But I definitely respect your thoughts on the matter though, thanks.
-
Alex Hall said (6 Aug 2007):
This is great, very surreal, love the colours and tones.
-
free speech said (16 Aug 2007):
I somehow agree with jrjrjrjr. BUT, the picture is outstanding. I just feel sorry to the rest of the members who posted a more deserving reward (IF THE RULES WERE ACTUALLY FOLLOWED BY THE JUDGES).
-
Marc Sims said (18 Aug 2007):
As part of a respectable company that leads a team of graphic artists, I find this photograph OVER PROCESSED. It' is indeed a beautiful picture (NO DOUBT ABOUT IT). If I was just given the opportunity to jude, I could have included this in the magazine ONLY, ONLY if the 'OVERT PROCESSING' is NOT A RULE. I therefore conclude that the jpgmag judges did a bad job in choosing this picture as well as some (over processed) pictures that were included in the magazine (dream theme).
-
Hugh Scott said (19 Aug 2007):
Nothing, I see nothing here, has our viewpoint changed so much that is meant to inspire?
Not to mention the "over processed" issue. -
Brad Flora said (30 Jan 2008):
Whether Digital or Chemical, whatever technique best realizes the story being told is the one that should be used to represent that reality. In the case of this picture, the tone of the image perfectly conveys the potential for raw terror that is possible in such a lonely place.
-
chuck goodman gave props (15 Oct 2009):
This photo reminds me of a scene from the movie "THE WALL"
