Alligator behind glass. Lincoln Park Zoo, Chicago, Illinois.
We have gotten so used to thinking of zoos as centers of entertainment, but rarely stop to think about how they not only permanently alter the lives of the caged animals, but ultimately affect our ecosystem and the natural landscape in which the animals once lived.
Some consider keeping animals in captivity a way to lesson their likelihood of becoming extinct, and "protect" them from human predators. However, it is well documented that animals in captivity lose many of the natural abilities of the species found in the wild, and are no longer able to survive in the wild once released. What good is "saving" them if we forever--and sometimes irreversably--alter their species' evolved and natural traits?
Since family members are often separated or sold to other zoos, animals in captivity often lose their natural socialization skills. Animals in captivity also lose many of their survival skills, like hunting and predatory instincts, since they don't need these skills to survive in a zoo. Captive animals' physical and mental activity is compromised by the static quality of the zoo environment and the small size of the cages. Some animals even go deaf from the excessive and constant human and mechanical sounds to which they are exposed in captivity.
Sadly, these animals may lose their ability to properly raise their young, since their natural skills are minimized or non-existant and they have little to offer their young in the form of survival in an environment over which they exert absolutely no control over their food, exercise, and environment.
Therefore, animals in captivity are affected by extreme boredom, lack of appropriate exercise, poor quality food and a lack of variety of food, especially in poorly run facilities.
How does this impact our ecosystem? Animals that have been caged and then released into the wild almost always under-perform in both survival and reproduction, which are direct consequences of inbreeding and being reared in captivity for multiple generations. Since the development of their natural instincts and typical behavior has been stifled prematurely, animals in captivity that are released are unable to function normally in the wild. This lack of functioning in the wild can be extremely severe--for example, it was found that some animals in captivity that were used to being fed dead fish and meat by trainers were UNABLE to eat live fish and meat when released into the wild. These shocking patterns, created and maintained by humans, forever alter animal and plant evolution as well as the natural enviroment as we know it.
I sat by this alligator's cage for hours, watching hundreds of people knock, hit, tap, and pound on the glass cage. As demonstrated in this photo, some visitors had even gone so far as to scratch the cage to catch the alligator's attention. Some of those gashes were quite deep. To me, that's human impact on top of human impact.
23 responses
-
James Wedge gave props (23 Feb 2008):
sinister
-
Rheiana Lenox gave props (23 Feb 2008):
unfortunate. great photo, though!
-
Joshua Winterfield gave props (23 Feb 2008):
love it!
-
Stephanie Marie Hatch said (26 Feb 2008):
Zoos are also the only way that we are going to keep some animals alive. Isn't that sad? But is it better to keep those animals alive in captivity rather than lose them altogether? I think yes, but this opens a whole can of worms that I don't have time for here!
I think this is a great photo. The scratched glass really adds a sadness to this animals captivity. Some dumbass was surely taunting him... And the colors and blur are just lovely, rather somber, but moving. -
George Henderson gave props (26 Feb 2008):
strong image....got my vote
-
Nick Fancher gave props (27 Feb 2008):
This is a beautifully horrific image. Well done. I will be disappointed if this isn't published.
-
claudia luthi gave props (29 Feb 2008):
an exceptional shot and very to the point, the naked face of deprivation, the reflection of human alienation
-
sam simon said (2 Mar 2008):
cool shot.
-
Nelson Campbell gave props (2 Mar 2008):
Horrifying. Well done...
-
Ray Ordinario gave props (5 Mar 2008):
voted... nice to see something "fresh" on this theme
-
Rachel Mckinnie gave props (5 Mar 2008):
Spot on...
-
Sarah Beck gave props (6 Mar 2008):
very creepy.
-
reza vaezpour said (9 Mar 2008):
Cool...got my vote
-
Iraklis Lianos gave props (13 Mar 2008):
An image which remains ingrained.
-
Frederic Frognier gave props (15 Mar 2008):
Just awesome!
-
Dennis Blauer gave props (19 Mar 2008):
profoundly photographed and stated, without anthropomorphizing too!
-
Dennis Blauer added a link (19 Mar 2008):
-
Paul Lavallee gave props (19 Mar 2008):
great photo, great words
-
Catherine Hadler gave props (24 Mar 2008):
very nicely done
-
Teresa Nabais said (25 Mar 2008):
Powerful words and image. I'd like to see this published.
-
Danny Monster said (2 Apr 2008):
very scary and sad, love the blur
-
Brad Folkers said (25 Apr 2008):
Wow... brilliant head-on photo, and commentary. I recently read about white tigers and how they're inbred in captivity to retain the recessive gene, leading to all sorts of birth defects, etc. It's human greed to want to see these rare animals, but it's doing a disservice to the animals themselves.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_tiger
I do think you've overstated the risk of forever altering plant and animal evolution, however. If captive animals are reintroduced to the wild and are unable to survive outside a zoo, they'll simply (as harsh as that word sounds) die off and not affect the genes of the remaining population of animals. The only step with any evolution impact would only be the removal of individual animals from the wild in the first place. -
StaceyJane gave props (11 Dec 2008):
Great job. The photo is the perfect accompaniment to your written piece.





