14 responses
-
Dave Amos said (5 Aug 2007):
Shot has a great deal going for it, and one thing working against it. The thing working against it is the fact that you cut the picture almost exactly in half with that horizon line. Should I pay more attention to the sky, or more attention to the city lights?
-
Oliver Fluck said (5 Aug 2007):
I cannot say anything than "pay attention to the whole scene". The sky looked just as impressive as the city lights that day.
-
nicole mabry gave props (6 Aug 2007):
I live in NYC and have seen thousands of pictures of the city. This one is really nice, the colors are great.
-
Jim Robertson gave props (6 Aug 2007):
Wonderful!
-
Daniel Gordon said (9 Aug 2007):
Hmm... I could be wrong, but I thought the point was to separate the picture a bit- contrasting the monumental beauty of an artificially-built skyline against the natural and ephemeral beauty of a sunset.
Anyways, nice shot! -
Oliver Fluck said (9 Aug 2007):
Thanks for your comments.
@Daniel: I'm just sharing what I saw. -
Melinda McCoy said (10 Aug 2007):
Love it all, the sky, the city, the whole composition. Great job!
-
Dave Treiber gave props (10 Aug 2007):
great HDR image! however, definitely not off the beaten path
-
Oliver Fluck said (11 Aug 2007):
Thanks. This is not an HDR, Dave.
-
Alicia Aguirre gave props (17 Aug 2007):
This is just absolutely beautiful, nice job!
-
Brian Finkbiner said (24 Aug 2007):
This image looks very CG, did you edit your photograph at all?
-
Oliver Fluck said (24 Aug 2007):
Color balance and sharpening. What is CG?
-
Kelly Mears said (18 Sep 2007):
I disagree with the comment that the horizon line should not be in the middle. There are "rules" but they need to be broken sometimes... And the sky is equally as appealing as the city lights. I saw this picture and it made me go "WOW." Great shot! Props.
-
Yi gave props (11 Oct 2009):
waoh, wonderful!
